Monday, January 27, 2014

13. Frida Kahlo & Philosophy

Source
Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher known for his outspoken nature and opinions that greatly differed from those of other well-known philosophers. Among these opinions are his controversial views on good and evil. According to Nietzsche, morality is man-made. People developed definitions of right and wrong to benefit themselves, and to define those that they consider to be "inferior" to them as bad people.  Based upon this conclusion, Nietzsche believed that what is good and what is evil is all based upon perspective.
            Frida Kahlo's painting, commonly known as "A few Small Nips," depicts a man who has stabbed his wife in a fit of rage. At first look, it is easy to say that what the man has done is evil. After all, he has just brutally murdered his wife. But according to Nietzsche, what is good and evil depends on perspective.
            Frida Kahlo painted this work after reading a story about a man who had killed his wife after she cheated on him. To the man, what his wife has done is evil. He killed her out of revenge, thereby making his deed not evil, but good. In his mind, he has not done something wrong. His wife was the one who had committed an evil act. In his mind, his deed is justified. In his mind, killing his wife was the right thing to do. He does not see his act as evil. Most people, however, would see his act as evil. They see a woman who appears defenseless, and has been stabbed multiple times. Most of us would think that the taking of a life is an evil thing to do. That is our perspective, though. The killer sees the act as good, rather than evil.
          According to Nietzsche's philosophy, good and bad are not opposites. Instead, he says they are just different. Definitions of good and evil vary. What one person believes is evil, another might see as good. Morality was created by humans, who could form it to mean whatever they wish. This then leads us to question whether the murder was actually evil, or simply the man’s definition of good.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

12. The Truman Show & Philosophy

Source
     The movie The Truman Show tells the story of a real man in a completely made up world. Truman is real, but everything he sees is what Christof wants him to see. I think that even the subtle details of the movie have deeper meanings, and overall the movie really makes you think. We have Truman - "True Man" - Truman's name is an allusion to the fact that the only thing that is real about The Truman Show is Truman himself. Then we have Christof - "Christ of" - Christof's name describes exactly what he is. For Truman, Christof is God. Christof controls every facet of Trumans entire life. He is the creator of Truman's world, and he controls everything that happens to Truman. He has the power of a God over Truman. The part in the end of the movie, when Truman is about to leave and suddenly Christof's voice comes through the sky - that was a symbol of Christof's power as the God of Truman's life. Though I think early on, Christof must have realized that human nature would eventually lead Truman to seek the truth, and Christof could not really control that. So he manipulated Truman's life to give him this fear of water. Truman lived on an "island" - literally surrounded by water. When Christof forced into Truman a fear of water, he was ensuring that Truman would not attempt to leave the life that he had created for him. So Christof was playing God, and Truman was just living the life that Christof made for him.
     But besides random philosophical symbols within the movie, I think there is one overarching theme in the movie. I think The Truman Show is a modern way of explain Plato's Allegory of the Cave.
     Now, the Allegory of the Cave is one of my favorite themes that we've gone over this year, and I feel that of all the themes we have studied, I know this one very well. So let's start with the cave. Within the cave, there are supposed to be people holding objects before a fire. There is a group of chained up prisoners facing a wall, who cannot see the people holding the objects. All that they see are the shadows of the objects - they only see what the people want them to see. Relating this to the movie, we have Christof as the man holding up the object, and Truman as the chained up prisoner. As in the Allegory of the cave, this is the only life Truman has ever known. Christof has manipulated Truman his entire life, and only shown Truman what he wants him to see.
     In the allegory of the cave, one of the prisoners escapes to the outside world. Obviously, in the movie, Truman is the escapee. But long before that happens, there is a "light" that Truman sees that makes him begin to seek enlightenment. His first glimpse at this light is of course when the light falls down from the ceiling - no pun intended. But it all begins to come into focus as he sees his "father" and begins to notice how strange his life really is. He is beginning to suspect that someone is holding everything he has known before the fire, and now he wants to know what is behind the fire that Christof is using to manipulate him. So Truman does as the prisoner in the Allegory of the Cave does - he puts on a brave face, overcomes the storm (which seems to be the last object Christof has held in front of the fire), and makes it to the edge of his "cave." In the end, Truman finally escapes the cave he has known his whole life, in order to enlighten himself to the real world.
     So let's recap - Truman is the prisoner, Christof holds the objects in front of the fire, and Seahaven is the cave. For all of Trumans life, Christof has only shown him the shadows he wants him to see. At first, Truman is afraid to leave Seahaven (the cave) because it is everything he has ever known. But eventually, he leaves the "cave" to enlighten himself and live the life he wants to live.

Sunday, January 5, 2014

11. I am an actual Marriage Counselor

     I think when you truly love a person, there isn't a thing about them that you don't love. And I mean in terms of "bad" habits or traits - it's totally ok to not love somebody's drug addiction or alcoholism - but if you really love a person, you love everything about them. Even if they do something that annoys you, you get through it. It's not a big deal, because you love that person. Feel free to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about - I'm too young to know what love "is" I suppose - but I've seen enough failed marriages and relationships in my life to see that loving a person for who they are is so important. Too many people are making themselves unhappy because they are choosing to get upset over dumb things. Things that won't be important an hour from now. Like leaving a dish in the sink. Let's not fight about the bowl. It's just a bowl. Ask them to wash it. Don't file for divorce because of the bowl. It doesn't need that kind of guilt on it's little bowl shoulders. 
     But in all seriousness, couples get too worked up over stupid things. Keep your cool. Wash the bowl, put down the toilet seat, and throw on a movie. Relax yourself. There are bigger things to worry about than whether or not it's your turn to make the bed. And I think that maybe this country would not have such a high divorce rate if people would learn to let the little things go, and work through their problems like adults. When you marry someone, you are making a contract. You have decided that this is the person that you want to spend your life with. I think that little fights over little things build up into big fights over big things. And over time, this is what overwhelms people and causes them to think that the only way we can fix things is by ending things. Which sounds really dumb, if you ask me. So maybe, when you're about to blow up over a bowl in the sink, you should be reminding yourself about why you love that person. Think about every good thing about them. Remind yourself why you're together. Maybe then you'll see that these little annoying things are really not so significant after all. And give the poor bowl a break. 
This is an excerpt from the book of Saskia. One day, I'll publish a whole book of marriage advice. Thank me later.